Supervised node
A per-user daemon owns device authentication, supervision, local policy, and the outbound tunnel.
Built for accountable production
Bernato coordinates isolated agent work across trusted machines through one authenticated outbound WebSocket per node. Local policy—not a cloud prompt—retains authority over paths, executables, terminals, and memory.
Repository-backed product facts · reviewed 26 August 2026
Keep the browser workflow central while execution, credentials, repositories, and process authority stay at the selected node.
A per-user daemon owns device authentication, supervision, local policy, and the outbound tunnel.
The broker multiplexes typed control, terminal, diff, and decision frames; it is not a generic TCP proxy.
Every repository task receives a detached Git worktree; non-repository work receives a private scratch space.
Expand the matrix. Choose by boundary and workflow, not slogans.
| This system | Alternative · Devin | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Distributed agent runs on operator-trusted machines | Cloud-brain coding agent with an isolated Devbox |
| Deployment boundary | One authenticated outbound WSS connection per node | Brain in Cognition Cloud; cloud or customer-dedicated Devbox |
| Evidence model | Sequenced protocol events and Git-tracked reviewed receipts | Use the vendor documentation for current session-record features |
| Operator control | Target-owned policy resolves paths, projects, and executables | Workspace operates under the cloud brain’s control |
| Integration surface | CLI, hosted app, and authenticated numeric-loopback IDE | Web, Slack, and API entry points |
Source
The intended license is MIT; the release gate is not complete.
Local runtime
Build from the repository for evaluation; no qualified binary artifact is advertised.
Hosted broker
Hosted pricing will be published only after broker and support qualification.
Current status. There is no active commercial offer. The runtime is implemented, but release and platform qualification remain fail-closed.
Start with the architecture, reproduce the documented workflow, and verify the boundary against your own threat model.
No. Mutable vendor pricing is deliberately excluded. Verify current vendor terms before a purchase decision.
The status note, architecture page, and engineering articles state the current boundary and failure behaviour.